Today was Browne’s Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles, Article 17 — predestination and election.
Browne traces a clean patristic consensus: the elect are the baptized of the Church. The language holds together reasonably well until Augustine, who sharpens it under pressure from Pelagius. By the Reformation the question has drifted considerably — is it divine foreknowledge, or double predestination as an act of sovereign will? The further the Church moves from sacramental life and into systematic abstraction, the worse it gets.
What keeps pulling me back is simpler than any of the scholastic frameworks. Jesus taught in parables. The Church dispenses grace. She deals in mysteries. And when Peter tried to make the Lord’s sovereign purposes into an object of curiosity — what about this man? — he got the only answer that actually matters:
“If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow me.” (John 21:22)
Less interested in elegant descriptions of the Divine prerogative. More interested in being the elect — imitating the One who died for sinners and said follow me.
Tomorrow: more Browne.
Leave a Reply